(PS) Murphy v. Occupational Safety and Health Administration
Opinion
SHANNON O. MURPHY, SR., d/b/a No. 2:21–cv–0398–JAM–CKD PS SHEETMETAL & ASSOCIATES, Plaintiff, (ECF Nos. 1, 3) v. OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND Defendant. On April 5, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations (ECF No. 3), which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. No objections were filed. Accordingly, the court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). The court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing, concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the findings and recommendations in full. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The findings and recommendations (ECF No. 3) are ADOPTED IN FULL; 2. The action is DISMISSED without prejudice and without leave to amend; and 3. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case. DATED: May 20, 2021 /s/ John A. Mendez THE HONORABLE JOHN A. MENDEZ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
(PS) Murphy v. Occupational Safety and Health Administration ((PS) Murphy v. Occupational Safety and Health Administration) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.