(PS) Murphy v. JP Morgan Chase & Co.
Opinion
SHANNON O. MURPHY, SR., No. 2:20-cv-01688-TLN-CKD Plaintiff, ORDER v. Defendant. Plaintiff Shannon O. Murphy, Sr. (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se, has filed the instant civil action. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On November 18, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations (ECF No. 7), which were served on Plaintiff and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. (ECF No. 7.) Plaintiff has not filed any objections to the findings and recommendations. Accordingly, the Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983); see also 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). /// Having reviewed the file under the applicable legal standards, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The Findings and Recommendations filed on November 18, 2020 (ECF No. 7), are adopted in full; 2. Plaintiff’s claims are DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b); and 3. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. DATED: December 17, 2020
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
(PS) Murphy v. JP Morgan Chase & Co. ((PS) Murphy v. JP Morgan Chase & Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.