(PS) Murphy v. Federal Bureau of Investigation

District Court, E.D. California·Decided July 8, 2021·No. 2:21-cv-00141·Unknown

Opinion

SHANNON O. MURPHY, SR. No. 2:21-cv-00141-TLN-CKD Plaintiffs, v. ORDER INVESTIGATION, Defendant.

Plaintiff Shannon O. Murphy, Sr. (“Plaintiff”) is an individual proceeding pro se in the instant action. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On May 12, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 4.) Plaintiff has not filed timely objections to the findings and recommendations. The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). /// The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The Findings and Recommendations filed May 12, 2021 (ECF No. 4), are ADOPTED IN FULL; 2. This action is DISMISSED for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, failure to state a claim and failure to prosecute, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); and 3. The Clerk’s office is directed to close this case. DATE: July 7, 2021 { J) /) “ Wh Vokoy Troy L. Nunley) United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

(PS) Murphy v. Federal Bureau of Investigation, (E.D. Cal. 2021).

(PS) Murphy v. Federal Bureau of Investigation ((PS) Murphy v. Federal Bureau of Investigation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Johns-Manville, Inc. v. Pocker
26 F.2d 204 (Eighth Circuit, 1928)