(PS) Mororish Science Temple of America v. Nunley

District Court, E.D. California·Decided February 28, 2020·No. 2:19-cv-01395·Unknown

Opinion

GS L. LOVE El, et al., No. 2:19-cv-01395-KJM-KJN PS Plaintiffs, ORDER v. TROY NUNLEY, et al., Defendants. On January 27, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. No objections were filed. The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations of law by the magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by both the district court and [the appellate] court . . . .”). Having reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the proper analysis. ///// ///// ///// Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: 1. The Findings and Recommendations filed January 27, 2020, are ADOPTED. 2. This action is dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). DATED: February 27, 2020.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

(PS) Mororish Science Temple of America v. Nunley, (E.D. Cal. 2020).

(PS) Mororish Science Temple of America v. Nunley ((PS) Mororish Science Temple of America v. Nunley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Donald Milton Orand v. United States
602 F.2d 207 (Ninth Circuit, 1979)
Arthur Robbins, III v. Tom L. Carey
481 F.3d 1143 (Ninth Circuit, 2007)