(PS) Montue v. County of San Diego Sheriff's Department

District Court, S.D. California·Decided September 12, 2023·No. 3:22-cv-00586·Unknown

Opinion

Case No.: 22cv0586 DMS (DEB) JOHN MONTUE,

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR v. APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL CITY OF SAN DIEGO, et al., Defendants. Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for appointment of counsel. In general, there is no constitutional right to counsel in a civil case. Palmer v. Valdez, 560 F.3d 965, 970 (9th Cir. 2009) (citing Storseth v. Spellman, 654 F.2d 1349, 1353 (9th Cir. 1981)). In “exceptional circumstances,” however, a court may exercise its discretion and “request an attorney to represent any person unable to afford counsel.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1); Palmer, 560 F.3d at 970. The court must consider both “‘the likelihood of success on the merits as well as the ability of the [Plaintiff] to articulate his claims pro se in light of the complexity of the legal issues involved.’” Palmer, 560 F.3d at 970 (quoting Weygandt v. Look, 718 F.2d 952, 954 (9th Cir. 1983)). At this point, there are no / / / / / / / / / exceptional circumstances warranting appointment of counsel. Accordingly, the Court denies Plaintiff's motion. Dated: September 12, 2023 em Dh a Yn. Hon. Dana M. Sabraw, Chief Judge United States District Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

(PS) Montue v. County of San Diego Sheriff's Department, (S.D. Cal. 2023).

(PS) Montue v. County of San Diego Sheriff's Department ((PS) Montue v. County of San Diego Sheriff's Department) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related