(PS) Millsaps v. State Farm Insurance Companies
Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 PATRICIA G. MILLSAPS, Case No. 2:24-cv-3673-DC-JDP (PS) 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 14 STATE FARM INSURANCE COMPANIES, 15 Defendant. 16 17 On February 11, 2025, I screened plaintiff’s complaint and dismissed it for lack of 18 jurisdiction and for failure to state a claim. ECF 3. I ordered plaintiff to file, within thirty days, 19 either an amended complaint or a notice of voluntary dismissal of this action. Id. I subsequently 20 granted plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time and gave her until April 10, 2025, to file an 21 amended complaint. ECF No. 5. Despite that extension, she has not filed an amended complaint. 22 The court has the inherent power to control its docket and may, in the exercise of that 23 power, impose sanctions where appropriate, including dismissal. Bautista v. Los Angeles Cnty., 24 216 F.3d 837, 841 (9th Cir. 2000); see Local Rule 110 (“Failure of counsel or of a party to 25 comply with these Rules or with any order of the Court may be grounds for imposition by the 26 Court of any and all sanctions . . . within the inherent power of the Court.”). A court may dismiss 27 an action based on a party’s failure to prosecute an action, failure to obey a court order, or failure 28 to comply with local rules. See Henderson v. Duncan, 779 F.2d 1421, 1424 (9th Cir. 1986) 1 | (dismissal for lack of prosecution and failure to comply with local rules). 2 I will give plaintiff a chance to explain why the court should not dismiss the case for 3 | failure to file an amended complaint. Plaintiffs failure to respond to this order will constitute 4 | another failure to comply with a court order and will result in a recommendation that this action 5 | be dismissed. Accordingly, plaintiff is ordered to show cause within fourteen days why this case 6 | should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute, failure to comply with court orders, and failure to 7 | state aclaim. Should plaintiff wish to continue with this lawsuit, she shall file, within fourteen 8 || days, an amended complaint. 9 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. ll ( ie — Dated: _ April 24, 2025 Q————. 12 JEREMY D. PETERSON 3 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
(PS) Millsaps v. State Farm Insurance Companies ((PS) Millsaps v. State Farm Insurance Companies) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.