(PS) Mehl v. Countrywide Bank, NA

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 GAVIN MEHL, No. 2:19-cv-1005 TLN CKD (PS) 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 COUNTRYWIDE BANK, NA, et. al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 By order filed August 31, 2020 plaintiff’s amended complaint was dismissed and thirty 18 days leave to file a second amended complaint was granted. The thirty-day period has now 19 expired, and plaintiff has not filed a second amended complaint or otherwise responded to the 20 court's order. 21 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without 22 prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 23 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 24 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen after 25 being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with 26 the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and 27 ///// 28 ///// 1 Recommendations.” Plaintiff advised that failure to file objections within the specified time 2 || waives the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. YIst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 3 | 1991). 4 | Dated: November 10, 2020 Pee a4 if / /, CAN fu fl. ay CAROLYN K. DELANEY 6 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 || id 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28