(PS) Maloney v. Allstate Indemnity Co.

CourtDistrict Court, E.D. California
DecidedJanuary 27, 2021
Docket2:20-cv-02523
StatusUnknown

This text of (PS) Maloney v. Allstate Indemnity Co. ((PS) Maloney v. Allstate Indemnity Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
(PS) Maloney v. Allstate Indemnity Co., (E.D. Cal. 2021).

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL MALONEY, No. 2:20–cv–2523–MCE–KJN PS 12 Plaintiff, ORDER RE: EXTENSION OF TIME 13 v. (ECF No. 8.) 14 ALLSTATE INDEMNITY CO., 15 Defendant. 16 17 The court is in receipt of plaintiff’s motion for extension of time. (ECF No. 8.) However, 18 plaintiff does not specify for what matter he needs more time. There are no pending dispositive 19 motions, and the only upcoming deadlines deal with scheduling of the case. (See ECF No. 2, the 20 order setting status conference, at ¶¶ 3-5.) Given that plaintiff is incarcerated, and given that 21 defendants have just recently requested permission to confer with plaintiff other than in person, 22 the court will extend the deadline for the parties to confer over their Rule 26 mandatory 23 disclosures. (See Id. at ¶ 3.) The parties shall have until February 28, 2021, to complete this 24 process, and the court will include a copy of Rule 26 with this order. 25 The parties are obligated to file a joint status report for case scheduling (see id. at ¶ 5) by 26 May 13, 2021. The status (pretrial scheduling) conference, currently set for Thursday, May 20, 27 2021, is vacated, and the court will issue the scheduling order based on the joint status report. 28 See Local Rule 230(l). 1 Additionally, the court notes from plaintiff’s motion that he appears to have been 2 transferred to Avenal State Prison. Currently, plaintiff’s address is listed as DVI in the court’s 3 docket. The court will direct the Clerk to update plaintiff’s address. However, plaintiff should 4 note for the future that he is to notify the court of any change of address in a separate document 5 captioned for this case and entitled “Notice of Change of Address.” A notice of change of 6 address must be properly served on other parties. Service of documents at the address of record 7 for a party is fully effective. See L.R. 182(f). A party’s failure to inform the court of a change of 8 address may result in the imposition of sanctions including dismissal of the action. 9 Since it is unclear whether plaintiff has access to a copy of the court’s local rules, the 10 Clerk will be directed to send plaintiff a copy along with this order. 11 Finally, given the fact of plaintiff’s incarceration, the court will issue additional orders to 12 align certain procedures in this case with those typical for incarcerated litigants. 13 ORDER 14 It is HEREBY ORDERED that: 15 1. The parties shall have until February 28, 2021, to confer regarding their Rule 26 16 mandatory disclosures; 17 2. The status (pretrial scheduling) conference, currently set for Thursday, May 20, 2021, 18 is VACATED; 19 3. The parties are obligated to file a joint status report regarding case scheduling no later 20 than May 13, 2021; 21 4. The Clerk of the Court is directed to change plaintiff’s address to reflect his being 22 incarcerated at Avenal State Prison; 23 5. The Clerk of the Court is also directed to serve on plaintiff a copy of the Local Rules 24 of Court; 25 6. Unless otherwise ordered, all motions to dismiss, motions for summary judgment, 26 motions concerning discovery, motions pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7, 11, 12, 15, 41, 27 55, 56, 59 and 60, and E.D. Cal. R. 110, shall be briefed pursuant to L.R. 230(l). 28 Failure to timely oppose such a motion may be deemed a waiver of opposition to the 1 motion. See L.R. 230(l). Opposition to all other motions need be filed only as 2 directed by the court; 3 7. If plaintiff is released from prison while this case is pending, any party may request 4 application of the other provisions of L.R. 230 in lieu of L.R. 230(l). Until such a 5 motion is granted, L.R. 230(l) will govern all motions described in #6 above 6 regardless of plaintiff’s custodial status. See L.R. 102(d); 7 8. Pursuant to Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 952, 957 (9th Cir. 1998) (en banc), and 8 Klingele v. Eikenberry, 849 F.2d 409 (9th Cir. 1988), the court hereby informs 9 plaintiff of the following requirements for opposing a motion for summary judgment 10 pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 56. Such a motion is a request for an order for judgment in 11 favor of the defendant without trial. A defendant’s motion for summary judgment will 12 set forth the facts that the defendant contends are not reasonably subject to dispute and 13 that entitle the defendant to judgment. To oppose a motion for summary judgment, 14 plaintiff must show proof of his or her claims. Plaintiff may do this in one or more of 15 the following ways. Plaintiff may rely on plaintiff’s statements made under penalty of 16 perjury in the complaint if the complaint shows that plaintiff has personal knowledge 17 of the matters stated and plaintiff specifies those parts of the complaint on which 18 plaintiff relies. Plaintiff may serve and file one or more affidavits or declarations 19 setting forth the facts that plaintiff believes prove plaintiff’s claims; the person who 20 signs an affidavit or declaration must have personal knowledge of the facts stated. 21 Plaintiff may rely on written records, but plaintiff must prove that the records are what 22 plaintiff asserts they are. Plaintiff may rely on all or any part of the transcript of one 23 or more depositions, answers to interrogatories, or admissions obtained in this 24 proceeding. If plaintiff fails to contradict the defendant’s evidence with 25 counteraffidavits or other admissible evidence, the court may accept defendant’s 26 evidence as true and grant the motion. If there is some good reason why such facts are 27 not available to plaintiff when required to oppose a motion for summary judgment, the 28 court will consider a request to postpone consideration of the defendant’s motion. See 1 Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(d). If plaintiff does not serve and file a written opposition to the 2 motion, or a request to postpone consideration of the motion, the court may consider 3 the failure to act as a waiver of opposition to the defendant’s motion. See L.R. 230(1). 4 If the court grants the motion for summary judgment, whether opposed or unopposed, 5 judgment will be entered for the defendant without a trial and the case will be closed 6 as to that defendant; and 7 9. If defendant moves for summary judgment, defendant must contemporaneously serve 8 with the motion, but in a separate document, a copy of the attached Rand Notice. See 9 Woods v. Carey, 684 F.3d 934, 935 (9th Cir. 2012); Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 952, 10 957 (9th Cir. 1998). Failure to do so may constitute grounds for denial of the 11 motion. 12 | Dated: January 27, 2021 8 Aectl Aharon 14 KENDALL J. NE malo.2523 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

1 Rand Notice to Plaintiff 2 This notice is provided to ensure that you, a pro se prisoner plaintiff, “have fair, timely and adequate notice 3 of what is required” to oppose a motion for summary judgment. See Woods v. Carey, 684 F.3d 934 (9th Cir. 2012); 4 Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 952

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
(PS) Maloney v. Allstate Indemnity Co., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ps-maloney-v-allstate-indemnity-co-caed-2021.