(PS) Love v. Tri-Counties Bank

District Court, E.D. California·Decided February 28, 2023·No. 2:22-cv-01761·Unknown

Opinion

1 BUCHALTER A Professional Corporation 2 ROBERT S. MCWHORTER (SBN: 226186) JARRETT S. OSBORNE-REVIS (SBN: 289193) 3 500 Capitol Mall, Suite 1900 Sacramento, CA 95814 4 Telephone: 916.945.5170 Email: rmcwhorter@buchalter.com 5 josbornerevis@buchalter.com 6 Attorneys for Defendant TRI COUNTIES BANK 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SACRAMENTO DIVISION 11 MARY LOVE, Case No. 2:22-cv-01761-KJM-CKD 12 Plaintiff, STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 13 vs. 14 TRI-COUNTIES BANK, 15 Defendant. 16 17

18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 STIPULATION 2 Plaintiff, Mary Love, and Defendant, Tri Counties Bank (collectively, “Parties”), jointly 3 request, under Rule 26(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, that the Court enter this 4 Stipulated Protective Order as an order of the Court, as follows: 5 1. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS 6 On February 10, 2023, the Court conducted a Scheduling Conference. Dkt. No. 9. The 7 Court directed the parties to file by February 24, 2023, a proposed protective order for discovery 8 only, as provided by Local Rule 141.1. 9 Disclosure and discovery activity in this action will likely involve producing confidential, 10 proprietary, or private information for which special protection from disclosure and use for any 11 purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may be warranted. Accordingly, the parties stipulate 12 to and petition the court to enter the following Stipulated Protective Order. The Parties 13 acknowledge that this Order does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to 14 discovery. The protection from disclosure or use under this Stipulated Protective Order extends 15 only to the information or items entitled to confidential treatment under the applicable legal 16 principles that fall within the scope of Protected Material as defined in Section 3 of this Stipulated 17 Protective Order. The parties also acknowledge that entry of this Stipulated Protective Order does 18 not prevent a Producing Party from attempting to maintain confidentiality or other rights by either 19 not producing or redacting information that is privileged, protected, or subject to privacy rights, 20 and entry of this Order does not mean a Receiving Party cannot challenge such non-production or 21 redaction. The parties further acknowledge, as outlined in Section 13.3 below, that this Stipulated 22 Protective Order does not entitle them to file confidential information under seal; Civil Local 23 Rule 141 sets forth the procedures that must be followed and the standards that will be applied 24 when a party seeks permission from the court to file material under seal. 25 2. DEFINITIONS 26 2.1 Authorized Third Party: Experts and professional jury or trial consultants, mock 27 jurors, and Professional Vendors to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this litigation. 28 1 2.2 Challenging Party: a Party or Non-Party that challenges the designation of 2 information or items under this Order. 3 2.3 “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items (also referred to as “Confidential 4 Information”): information (regardless of how it is generated, stored, or maintained) or tangible 5 things that qualify for protection under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c). 6 2.4 “CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” Information or Items (also 7 referred to as “Attorneys’ Eyes Only Confidential Information”): information (regardless of how 8 it is generated, stored or maintained) or tangible things that qualify for protection under Federal 9 Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c) such that, because of the nature of the information, the Designating 10 Party in good faith reasonably believes disclosure should be limited to only the attorneys for the 11 Receiving Party. 12 2.5 Counsel of Record: attorneys who are retained or employed to represent or advise 13 a party to this action and have appeared in this action on behalf of that Party or are affiliated with 14 a law firm that has appeared on behalf of that Party. 15 2.6 Designating Party: a Party or Non-Party that designates information or items it 16 produces in disclosures or responses to discovery as “CONFIDENTIAL” or “CONFIDENTIAL 17 ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.” 18 2.7 Disclosure or Discovery Material: all items or information, regardless of the 19 medium or manner in which it is generated, stored, or maintained (including, among other things, 20 testimony, transcripts, and tangible things), that are produced or generated in disclosures or 21 responses to discovery in this matter. 22 2.8 Expert: a person with specialized knowledge or experience in a matter pertinent to 23 the litigation who has been previously qualified as an expert in a court of law in the specific field 24 of expertise for which they are being retained and who has been retained by a Party or its counsel 25 to serve as an expert witness or as a consultant in this action. 26 2.9 Non-Party: any natural person, partnership, corporation, association, or other legal 27 entity not named as a Party to this action. 28 1 2.10 Party: any party to this action, including its officers, directors, employees, 2 consultants, retained experts, and Outside Counsel of Record (and their support staff). 3 2.11 Producing Party: a Party or Non-Party that produces Disclosure or Discovery 4 Material in this action. 5 2.12 Professional Vendors: persons or entities that provide litigation support services 6 (e.g., photocopying, videotaping, translating, preparing exhibits or demonstrations, and 7 organizing, storing, or retrieving data in any form or medium) and their employees and 8 subcontractors. 9 2.13 Protected Material: any Disclosure or Discovery Material that is designated as 10 either “CONFIDENTIAL” or “CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” that falls 11 within the scope of the information eligible for protection under Local Rule 141.1(c) as outlined 12 in Section 3 below. 13 2.14 Receiving Party: a Party that receives Disclosure or Discovery Material from a 14 Producing Party. 15 3. SCOPE/DESCRIPTION OF INFORMATION ELIGIBLE FOR PROTECTION 16 The protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order are not intended, and should not 17 be construed, as a blanket protective order contrary to San Jose Mercury News, Inc. v. U.S. Dist. 18 Court--N. Dist. (San Jose), 187 F.3d 1096, 1103 (9th Cir. 1999) (“[B]lanket orders are inherently 19 subject to challenge and modification, as the party resisting disclosure generally has not made a 20 particularized showing of good cause with respect to any individual document.”). 21 Pursuant to Local Rule 141.1(c)(1), the term “Protected Material” shall consist of the 22 following types of information eligible for protection: 23 (a) Documents containing trade secrets, commercially sensitive information, or 24 propriety information of Tri Counties Bank; 25 (b) Plaintiff’s tax returns (state or federal), financial statements, and bank 26 statements; 27 (c) Documents containing Plaintiff’s financial information; and 28 1 (d) Documents containing personal information regarding any employees, 2 agents, or representatives of Plaintiff or Tri Counties Bank.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

(PS) Love v. Tri-Counties Bank, (E.D. Cal. 2023).

(PS) Love v. Tri-Counties Bank ((PS) Love v. Tri-Counties Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.