(PS) James v. Metzger Mgt. Co.
Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ANTHONY ALEXANDER JAMES, No. 2:23-cv-1174-DAD-SCR 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 MATZGER MANAGEMENT COMPANY, 15 Defendant. 16
17 18 Plaintiff Anthony Alexander James is proceeding pro se in this action, which was referred 19 to the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). On 20 March 31, 2025, the Court granted Defendant’s motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s First Amended 21 Complaint (“FAC”). ECF No. 23. Plaintiff was granted leave to amend his causes of action for 22 negligence and violation of the Fair Housing Act, and to amend his FAC to add a cause of action 23 for intentional infliction of emotional distress in place of his cause of action for harassment and 24 fraud. Id. at 2. 25 The initial order set a twenty-one-day deadline for filing such a Second Amended 26 Complaint (“SAC”). Id. On May 1, 2025, this Court issued a minute order for Plaintiff to show 27 cause within 21 days as to why this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute by filing 28 an SAC, or alternatively to file such SAC. ECF No. 24. To date, Plaintiff has not amended his 1 | FAC or otherwise responded to the order to show cause. 2 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED THAT this action be DISMISSED 3 | WITHOUT PREJUDICE, for failure to state a claim. 4 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 5 || assigned to this case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within fourteen (14) 6 || days after being served with these findings and recommendations, Plaintiff may file written 7 || objections with the court. Such document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s 8 | Findings and Recommendations.” Local Rule 304(d). Plaintiff is advised that failure to file 9 || objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. 10 | Martinez v. Yist, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 11 | DATED: June 13, 2025 md 13 SEAN C. RIORDAN 14 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
(PS) James v. Metzger Mgt. Co. ((PS) James v. Metzger Mgt. Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.