(PS) Grissom v. Modesto Police Department

Opinion

TONY VALENTINO GRISSOM, Case No. 1:21-cv-01273-JLT-SAB

Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO DISMISS ACTION v. FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM AND FAILURE TO PROSECUTE/OBEY A COURT MODESTO POLICE DEPARTMENT, et ORDER

al., (Doc. 11)

Defendants.

The assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations that the action be dismissed for failure to state a claim and failure to prosecute/obey a court order. (Doc. 11.) The court advised Plaintiff that the “failure to file objections within the specified time may result in the waiver of rights on appeal.” (Id. at 20, citing Wilkerson v. Wheeler, 772 F.3d 834, 839 (9th Cir. 2014); Baxter v. Sullivan, 923 F.2d 1391, 1394 (9th Cir. 1991).) The magistrate judge provided plaintiff 21 days to file objections to the findings and recommendations. (Id.) He did not do so filed, and the time to object has expired. According to 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C) and Britt v. Simi Valley United School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983), this Court conducted a de novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the matter, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations are supported by the record and proper analysis. Thus, the Court ORDERS: 1. The Findings and Recommendations dated March 23, 2022 (Doc. 11), are ADOPTED in full. 2. This action is DISMISSED, without prejudice. 3. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. ITIS ORDERED. 6] Dated: _ April 20, 2022 Cerin | Tower TED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE