(PS) Grandy v. State of California

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 10 11 LEANA B. GRANDY, No. 2:19-cv-00774-MCE-KJN 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 On September 25, 2019, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations (ECF 18 No. 11), which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the 19 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. No objections were 20 filed. 21 Accordingly, the Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. 22 United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are 23 reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 24 1983). 25 The Court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing, 26 concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the findings and recommendations in full. Accordingly, 27 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 28 1. The findings and recommendations (ECF No. 11) are ADOPTED in full; ] 2. Defendants’ motions to dismiss (ECF Nos. 6, 7) are GRANTED; 2 3. The action is DISMISSED with prejudice; and 3 4. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. 5 || Dated: November 19, 2019

UNITED STATES DISTRICT TOD 8 9 10 1] 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28