(PS) Gettemy v. LVNV Funding LLC

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RUSSELL J. GETTEMY, 2:23-cv-01948-DAD-CKD (PS) 12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 13 v. 14 TRANS UNION LLC, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 By order filed July 11, 2025, plaintiff was ordered to show cause, within 14 days, why this 18 action should not be dismissed or failure to prosecute. (ECF No. 60.) The 14-day period has now 19 expired, and plaintiff has not responded to the court’s order. 20 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed for failure 21 to prosecute. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 22 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 23 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 24 after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written 25 objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 26 //// 27 //// 28 //// 1 | “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Failure to file objections 2 || within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. 3 || Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 4 | Dated: July 30, 2025 Card ke yy a 5 CAROLYN K DELANEY? 6 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11] || 2/gettl948.f&rs 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28