(PS) Flynn v. County of Tuolumne

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 10 11 JOHN FLYNN, Case No. 2:24-cv-2265-DJC-JDP (PS)

12 Plaintiff,

13 v. ORDER 14 COUNTY OF TUOLUMNE, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 18 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On July 14, 2025, the Magistrate Judge filed 19 findings and recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which 20 contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be 21 filed within fourteen days. No objections were filed. 22 The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United 23 States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The Magistrate Judge’s conclusions of law 24 are reviewed de novo. See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) 25 (“[D]eterminations of law by the magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by both the 26 district court and [the appellate] court . . . .”). Having reviewed the file, the Court finds 27 the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the proper 28 1 | analysis. 2 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 3 1. The proposed Findings and Recommendations filed July 14, 2025, are 4 | ADOPTED; and 5 2. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case for plaintiff's failure to pay 6 | the filing fee. 7 9 | Dated: _ August 22, 2025 “Dane A Ch brett Hon. Daniel alabretta 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28