(PS) Eisner v. Hollister

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 10 11 GEORGIA MILES EISNER, No. 2:21-cv-02337-TLN-KJN 12 Plaintiff, ORDER 13 v. 14 DAVID HOLLISTER, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 On February 7, 2022, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations (ECF No. 18 5), which were served on Plaintiff and which contained notice that any objections to the findings 19 and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. No objections were filed. 20 Accordingly, the Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United 21 States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are 22 reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 23 1983). 24 The Court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing, 25 concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the findings and recommendations in full. 26 // 27 // 28 // 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations (ECF No. 5) are ADOPTED IN FULL; 3 2. The action is DISMISSED pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1); 4 12(b)(6); and 41(b), and further leave to amend is DENIED; and 5 3. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case. 6 | DATED: March 9, 2022 7 i /) 8 “ ! Lu ? Troy L. Nunley ] 10 United States District Judge 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28