(PS) Collins v. Wells Fargo and Co.

• Court: District Court, E.D. California
• Decided: January 8, 2024
• Docket: 2:23-cv-02676
• Status: Unknown

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 STEVEN RAY COLLINS, et al, No. 2:23-cv-02676-DAD-KJN 12 Plaintiff, ORDER

13 v.

14 WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. 15 Defendant. 16 17 On December 6, 2023, defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A filed a motion to dismiss.1 18 (ECF No. 9.) Defendant noticed its motion for a hearing to take place on February 27, 2024, at 19 9:00 a.m. before the undersigned. (Id.) Pursuant to this court’s Local Rules, any opposition to 20 the motion was to be filed and served no later than fourteen (14) days after the date the motion 21 was filed; i.e., by December 20, 2023. Further, a responding party who has no opposition to the 22 granting of the motion is required to serve and file a statement of non-opposition. See E.D. Cal. 23 L.R. 230(c) (“[a] responding party who has no opposition to the granting of the motion shall serve 24 and file a statement to that effect, specifically designating the motion in question”). That deadline 25 has now passed, and plaintiffs have not filed either a statement of opposition or a statement of 26 non-opposition. 27 1 This action proceeds before the undersigned pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and E.D. Cal. 28 Local Rule 302(c)(21). 1 A district court may impose sanctions, including involuntary dismissal of a plaintiff's case 2 pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b), where that plaintiff fails to prosecute his or her 3 case or fails to comply with the court's orders, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, or the court's 4 local rules. See e.g., Hells Canyon Preservation Council v. U.S. Forest Serv., 403 F.3d 683, 689 5 (9th Cir. 2005) (stating that courts may dismiss an action pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil 6 Procedure 41(b) sua sponte for a plaintiff's failure to prosecute or comply with the rules of civil 7 procedure or the court's orders); Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258, 1260 (9th Cir. 1992) 8 (“Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b), the district court may dismiss an action for 9 failure to comply with any order of the court”). 10 Here, plaintiffs, who proceed without counsel, have failed to file a written opposition or 11 statement of non-opposition by the required deadline, and therefore have not complied with Local 12 Rule 230(c). Further, plaintiffs’ failure to file any opposition indicates to the court that plaintiffs 13 may be consenting to the dismissal of this action. See Local Rule 230(c) (“A failure to file a 14 timely opposition may also be construed by the Court as a non-opposition to the motion.”). Thus, 15 plaintiffs’ claims are subject to dismissal. 16 Given plaintiffs’ pro se status, the court will not recommend dismissal at this time. 17 Instead, the court will vacate the February 27, 2024 hearing, and provide plaintiffs one final 18 opportunity to either respond to defendant’s motion to dismiss or to file a statement of non- 19 opposition. See L.R. 230(c) (“[n]o party will be entitled to be heard in opposition to a motion at 20 oral arguments if opposition to the motion has not been timely filed by that party....”). After the 21 expiration of the deadlines below, the court will decide the matter on the record and written 22 briefing only. Plaintiff is cautioned that any further failure to comply with the court’s Local 23 Rules and this order by failing to file either an opposition or statement of non-opposition will be 24 construed as non-opposition to the motion and will constitute additional grounds for dismissal 25 under Rule 41(b). 26 //// 27 //// 28 //// 1 ORDER 2 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 3 1. The February 27, 2024 hearing on defendant’s motion to dismiss (ECF No. 9) is 4 VACATED; 5 2. Within fourteen (14) days of this order, plaintiffs shall file a written opposition to 6 defendant’s motion to dismiss, or a statement of non-opposition; 7 a. Plaintiffs’ failure to file a written opposition will be deemed a statement of 8 non-opposition to the pending motion and consent to the granting of the 9 motion, and shall constitute an additional ground for the imposition of 10 appropriate sanctions, including a recommendation that plaintiffs’ entire case 11 be involuntarily dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil 12 Procedure 41(b); and 13 3. Within seven (7) days of any opposition, defendant may file a written reply. 14 || Dated: January 8, 2024 1 A Abar 16 | samen UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28