(PS) Chiu v. The President of the US

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 TAIFUSIN CHIU, No. 2:23-cv-01199-DJC-CKD PS 12 Plaintiff, ORDER 13 v. 14 THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITEDSTATES ET. AL., 15 Defendants. 16

17 On October 24, 2023, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and 18 recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which contained 19 notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed 20 within fourteen days. No objections were filed. 21 Accordingly, the Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See 22 Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The Magistrate Judge’s 23 conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 24 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). 25 The Court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause 26 appearing, concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the Proposed Findings and 27 Recommendations in full. 28 1 Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: 2 1. The Proposed Findings and Recommendations filed October 24, 2023, are 3 ADOPTED; 4 2. Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 2) is DENIED AS 5 MOOT; 6 3. The action is DISMISSED with prejudice; and 7 4. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case. 8 9 IT 1S SO ORDERED. 10 | Dated: _March 4, 2024 “Darel A CDbnetto Hon. Daniel alabretta " UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28