(PS) Bunio v. Victory Packaging, L.P.
Opinion
VINCE BUNIO, No. 2:18-cv-897-KJM-EFB PS Plaintiff, v. ORDER Defendant. On September 1, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. No objections were filed. The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations of law by the magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by both the district court and [the appellate] court . . . .”). Having reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the proper analysis. ///// ///// ///// Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: 1. The Findings and Recommendations filed September 1, 2020, are ADOPTED; 2. Defendant’s motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 22) is granted; and 3. The clerk is directed to enter judgment in defendant’s favor and close the case. DATED: October 21, 2020.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
(PS) Bunio v. Victory Packaging, L.P. ((PS) Bunio v. Victory Packaging, L.P.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.