Przyborowski v. O'Connell

272 A.D.2d 1096

This text of 272 A.D.2d 1096 (Przyborowski v. O'Connell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Przyborowski v. O'Connell, 272 A.D.2d 1096 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1947).

Opinion

Appeal by defendants from an order of the Albany Special Term of Supreme Court denying defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. Plaintiffs are not entitled to maintain this action. They had a complete remedy under article 78 of the Civil Practice Act to review the determination of defendants. Having failed to avail themselves of that remedy, they could not maintain an action for declaratory judgment. Order reversed on the law, without costs. Motion granted, without costs. Hill, P. J., Heffernan, Foster and Bussell, JJ., concur; Brewster, J., taking no part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
272 A.D.2d 1096, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/przyborowski-v-oconnell-nyappdiv-1947.