Pryor v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Pryor v. State

850 S.W.2d 301, 312 Ark. 246, 1993 Ark. LEXIS 140

CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas

DecidedMarch 1, 1993

DocketCR 93-111

StatusPublished

This text of 850 S.W.2d 301 (Pryor v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pryor v. State, 850 S.W.2d 301, 312 Ark. 246, 1993 Ark. LEXIS 140 (Ark. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appellant, Minnie Pryor, by her attorney, Paul N. Ford has filed a motion for rule on the clerk. Her attorney admits that the record was tendered late.

We find that such error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See per curiam dated February 5, 1979, In re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964; Terry v. State, 272 Ark. 243, 613 S.W.2d 90 (1981).

A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Appellant, Minnie Pryor, by her attorney, Paul N. Ford has filed a motion for rule on the clerk. Her attorney admits that the record was tendered late.

We find that such error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See per curiam dated February 5, 1979, In re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964; Terry v. State, 272 Ark. 243, 613 S.W.2d 90 (1981).

A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

850 S.W.2d 301, 312 Ark. 246, 1993 Ark. LEXIS 140, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pryor-v-state-ark-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack