Pryor v. Reno
This text of 171 F.3d 1281 (Pryor v. Reno) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Bill PRYOR, Attorney General for the State of Alabama, State of Alabama, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
Janet RENO, Attorney General of the United States, United States of America, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 98-6261.
United States Court of Appeals,
Eleventh Circuit.
May 11, 2000.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama (No. CV-97-D-1396-N); Ira DeMent, Judge.
ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Before TJOFLAT, Circuit Judge, and GODBOLD and HILL, Senior Circuit Judges.
BY THE COURT:
The Supreme Court of the United States, having vacated and remanded this case for further
consideration in the light of Reno v. Condon, 528 U.S. ----, 120 S.Ct. 666, 145 L.Ed.2d 587 (2000) it is
therefore
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED,
that the judgment of the district court in the above-referenced case is hereby VACATED and the case
is REMANDED to the United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama for further
consideration in light of Reno v. Condon, 528 U.S. ----, 120 S.Ct. 666 (2000).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
171 F.3d 1281, 1999 WL 187050, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pryor-v-reno-ca11-1999.