Pryor v. McHugh

Fourth Circuit

Pryor v. McHugh

585 F. App'x 55

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedOctober 23, 2014

DocketNo. 14-1605

StatusPublished

This text of 585 F. App'x 55 (Pryor v. McHugh) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pryor v. McHugh, 585 F. App'x 55 (4th Cir. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIÁM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Veda Pryor appeals the district court’s order dismissing her civil complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant Pryor in forma pauperis status, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Pryor v. McHugh, No. 8:13-cv-01269-PWG (D.Md. May 16, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this [56]*56court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIÁM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Veda Pryor appeals the district court’s order dismissing her civil complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant Pryor in forma pauperis status, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Pryor v. McHugh, No. 8:13-cv-01269-PWG (D.Md. May 16, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this [56]*56court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

585 F. App'x 55, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pryor-v-mchugh-ca4-2014.