Pryor v. Busby

1933 OK 309, 22 P.2d 361, 164 Okla. 51, 1933 Okla. LEXIS 747
CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma
DecidedMay 9, 1933
Docket24279
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 1933 OK 309 (Pryor v. Busby) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pryor v. Busby, 1933 OK 309, 22 P.2d 361, 164 Okla. 51, 1933 Okla. LEXIS 747 (Okla. 1933).

Opinion

ANDREWS, J.

This is an original proceeding in this court which was instituted for the purpose of procuring a writ of prohibition against the respondent herein, commanding him to desist and refrain from further proceedings in a cause pending in the district court of the Seventh judicial district of Oklahoma, and from exercising any further jurisdiction in that matter.

The specific ground of complaint was that the respondent was about to grant a petition for a new trial. While the proceeding was pending in this court, and prior to the issuance of the alternative writ of prohibition, the trial court set aside the order confirming a sale of real estate and directed that a new sale thereof be had. The alternative writ of prohibition was issued by this court without a showing of that action of the respondent.

The petitioner contends that that action was void, and that this court imay issue a permanent writ of prohibition, notwithstanding the action of the respondent. We think that the record in this ease does not sustain that contention.

In view of the fact that the petitioner has taken time to appeal and may perfect his appeal from the order complained of, we refrain from further discussion of the facts shown by the record.

The petition for the writ of prohibition is denied.

OULDISON, Y. O. J., and SWINDABB, McNEIBB, BAYBESS, and WEBCH, JJ., concur. RIBEY, C. J., and OSBORN, J., absent. BUSBY, J., absent and disqualified.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Smith v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board
447 P.2d 365 (California Supreme Court, 1968)
ANDERSON CONSTRUCTION COMPANY v. Franklin
1957 OK 196 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1957)
Oklahoma Railway Co. v. Cannon
1946 OK 354 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1946)
A. & E. Lumber Co. v. Atkinson
1939 OK 154 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1939)
Coombes v. Letcher
66 P.2d 769 (Montana Supreme Court, 1937)
Oklahoma Gas & Electric Co. v. Stout
1936 OK 283 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1936)
Postal Telegraph Cable Co. v. Industrial Accident Commission
37 P.2d 441 (California Supreme Court, 1934)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1933 OK 309, 22 P.2d 361, 164 Okla. 51, 1933 Okla. LEXIS 747, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pryor-v-busby-okla-1933.