Pry v. TRAILBLAZER TRANSPORTATION INC.

867 A.2d 524
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedJanuary 12, 2005
StatusPublished

This text of 867 A.2d 524 (Pry v. TRAILBLAZER TRANSPORTATION INC.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pry v. TRAILBLAZER TRANSPORTATION INC., 867 A.2d 524 (Pa. 2005).

Opinion

PAUL W. PRY, AN INDIVIDUAL
v.
TRAILBLAZER TRANSPORTATION, INC., AND TRANSCON, INC., NOW KNOWN AS US1 INDUSTRIES, INC., J. DOUGLAS MILLER, AN INDIVIDUAL,
v.
TRAILBLAZER TRANSPORTATION, INC., AND TRANSCON, INC., NOW KNOWN AS US1 INDUSTRIES, INC.,
CAM REGIONAL TRANSPORT, INC., AND LAUREL MOUNTAIN LEASING, INC.,
v.
TRAILBLAZER TRANSPORTATION, INC., AND TRANSCON, INC., NOW KNOWN AS US1 INDUSTRIES, INC.,
PETITION OF: TRAILBLAZER TRANSPORTATION, INC., AND TRANSCON, INC., NOW KNOWN AS US1 INDUSTRIES, INC.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Western District.

January 12, 2005.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 12th day of January, 2005, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
867 A.2d 524, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pry-v-trailblazer-transportation-inc-pa-2005.