Pruszynski v. Reeves

862 N.E.2d 116, 112 Ohio St. 3d 1489
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided February 28, 2007·No. 2006-2072·Published

Opinion

Geauga App. No. 2005-G-2612, 2006-0hio-5190. Discretionary appeal of appellant Van Driest is accepted.

Pfeifer and O’Connor, JJ., dissent. Discretionary appeal of appellant Kaufman is accepted on Proposition of Law Nos. I and III. Lundberg Stratton and Lanzinger, JJ., would also accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. II. Pfeifer, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pruszynski v. Reeves, 862 N.E.2d 116, 112 Ohio St. 3d 1489 (Ohio 2007).

862 N.E.2d 116 (Pruszynski v. Reeves) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.