Home/Ohio Supreme Court/Pruszynski v. Reeves

Pruszynski v. Reeves

862 N.E.2d 116, 112 Ohio St. 3d 1489
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 28, 2007
Docket2006-2072
StatusPublished

This text of 862 N.E.2d 116 (Pruszynski v. Reeves) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pruszynski v. Reeves, 862 N.E.2d 116, 112 Ohio St. 3d 1489 (Ohio 2007).

Opinion

Geauga App. No. 2005-G-2612, 2006-0hio-5190. Discretionary appeal of appellant Van Driest is accepted.

Pfeifer and O’Connor, JJ., dissent. Discretionary appeal of appellant Kaufman is accepted on Proposition of Law Nos. I and III. Lundberg Stratton and Lanzinger, JJ., would also accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. II. Pfeifer, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
862 N.E.2d 116, 112 Ohio St. 3d 1489, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pruszynski-v-reeves-ohio-2007.