Prunkle v. Drzewiecki
8 Ohio Law. Abs. 304, 1930 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 1096
This text of 8 Ohio Law. Abs. 304 (Prunkle v. Drzewiecki) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Prunkle v. Drzewiecki, 8 Ohio Law. Abs. 304, 1930 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 1096 (Ohio Ct. App. 1930).
Opinion
Under the state of the evidence in this case it is apparent that summons was never served on John Prunkle in any manner and that he had no knowledge of the bringing or pendency of the action until long after the judgment was rendered, and has not had his day in court on the original action.
Judgment reversed and cause remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Ruckert v. Math Realty Co.
40 N.E.2d 688 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1941)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
8 Ohio Law. Abs. 304, 1930 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 1096, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/prunkle-v-drzewiecki-ohioctapp-1930.