Pruneau v. Sanders
216 S.E.2d 911, 287 N.C. 664, 1975 N.C. LEXIS 1175
This text of 216 S.E.2d 911 (Pruneau v. Sanders) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Pruneau v. Sanders, 216 S.E.2d 911, 287 N.C. 664, 1975 N.C. LEXIS 1175 (N.C. 1975).
Opinion
Mary S. PRUNEAU
v.
Charlie R. SANDERS, Jr.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Wolff, Harrell & Mann, for plaintiff.
Maupin, Taylor & Ellis, for defendant.
Petition by plaintiff for writ of certiorari to review the decision of the Court of Appeals, 25 N.C.App. 510, 214 S.E.2d 288. Denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Pruneau v. Sanders
214 S.E.2d 288 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1975)
Stewart v. Stewart
216 S.E.2d 911 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1975)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
216 S.E.2d 911, 287 N.C. 664, 1975 N.C. LEXIS 1175, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pruneau-v-sanders-nc-1975.