Prune Bargaining Ass'n v. Bergland

Ninth Circuit

Prune Bargaining Ass'n v. Bergland

571 F.2d 1132

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedMarch 20, 1978

DocketNo. 75-3046

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 571 F.2d 1132 (Prune Bargaining Ass'n v. Bergland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Prune Bargaining Ass'n v. Bergland, 571 F.2d 1132 (9th Cir. 1978).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The judgment appealed from is affirmed for the reasons stated by Judge Orrick in his Memorandum Opinion, Prune Bargaining Association v. Butz, N.D.Cal., 1975, 444 F.Supp. 785. We add only that the judge did, on motion for new trial, consider appellants’ “Corrected Exhibit C.” As to that exhibit, he said:

[S]o far as the newly discovered evidence goes, I think it’s inconsequential, at best, the changes in the figures — and irrelevant at the least.

(R.T. 198.)

He was right.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI