Prulease, Inc. v. Henrico County

Henrico County Circuit Court

Prulease, Inc. v. Henrico County

11 Va. Cir. 248, 1988 Va. Cir. LEXIS 43

CourtHenrico County Circuit Court

DecidedApril 15, 1988

DocketCase No. 85L476

StatusPublished

This text of 11 Va. Cir. 248 (Prulease, Inc. v. Henrico County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Henrico County Circuit Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Prulease, Inc. v. Henrico County, 11 Va. Cir. 248, 1988 Va. Cir. LEXIS 43 (Va. Super. Ct. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

By JUDGE JAMES E. KULP

After mature consideration of the positions of the respective parties, the Court sustains the Defendant’s objections to interrogatories 5 and 6.

In the Court’s opinion these interrogatories would place an undue burden and expense upon the defendant. See Rule 4:1(c). Furthermore, the Court finds the provisions of Rule 4:8(f) to be inapplicable to the circumstances of this matter. The records in question are confidential tax records, and it would be unwarranted to allow them to be examined by plaintiffs. See § 58.1-3 of the Code of Virginia. The privacy rights of hundreds of citizens and businesses are at stake, and their rights should not be trampled upon except in the most extraordinary circumstances. The Court finds no such circumstances existing here.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By JUDGE JAMES E. KULP

After mature consideration of the positions of the respective parties, the Court sustains the Defendant’s objections to interrogatories 5 and 6.

In the Court’s opinion these interrogatories would place an undue burden and expense upon the defendant. See Rule 4:1(c). Furthermore, the Court finds the provisions of Rule 4:8(f) to be inapplicable to the circumstances of this matter. The records in question are confidential tax records, and it would be unwarranted to allow them to be examined by plaintiffs. See § 58.1-3 of the Code of Virginia. The privacy rights of hundreds of citizens and businesses are at stake, and their rights should not be trampled upon except in the most extraordinary circumstances. The Court finds no such circumstances existing here.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

11 Va. Cir. 248, 1988 Va. Cir. LEXIS 43, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/prulease-inc-v-henrico-county-vacchenrico-1988.