Pruitte v. State
884 So. 2d 101, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 5598, 2004 WL 868220
This text of 884 So. 2d 101 (Pruitte v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Pruitte v. State, 884 So. 2d 101, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 5598, 2004 WL 868220 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).
Opinion
Affirmed. See Teal v. State, 862 So.2d 871 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003); McCall v. State, 862 So.2d 807 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003). As this court did in both Teal and McCall, we certify direct conflict with Richardson v. State, 884 So.2d 950, 2003 WL 21697171 (Fla. 4th DCA July 23, 2003).
Affirmed; conflict certified.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Richardson v. State
884 So. 2d 950 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)
McCall v. State
862 So. 2d 807 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
Teal v. State
862 So. 2d 871 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
884 So. 2d 101, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 5598, 2004 WL 868220, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pruitte-v-state-fladistctapp-2004.