Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Pruitte v. State

Pruitte v. State

884 So. 2d 101, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 5598, 2004 WL 868220
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 23, 2004·No. No. 2D03-5279·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Teal v. State, 862 So.2d 871 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003); McCall v. State, 862 So.2d 807 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003). As this court did in both Teal and McCall, we certify direct conflict with Richardson v. State, 884 So.2d 950, 2003 WL 21697171 (Fla. 4th DCA July 23, 2003).

Affirmed; conflict certified.

SALCINES, STRINGER, and SILBERMAN, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pruitte v. State, 884 So. 2d 101, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 5598, 2004 WL 868220 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

884 So. 2d 101 (Pruitte v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Richardson v. State
884 So. 2d 950 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)
McCall v. State
862 So. 2d 807 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
Teal v. State
862 So. 2d 871 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)