Pruitte v. State
845 So. 2d 314, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 7144, 2003 WL 21118674
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 16, 2003·No. No. 2D02-5182·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Richard V. Pruitte argues that his violent career criminal sentence is illegal under Taylor v. State, 818 So.2d 544 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002), which held chapter 99-188, Laws of Florida, unconstitutional. However, his claim is facially insufficient because he has failed to allege how he was affected by the amendments to the violent career criminal statute contained within chapter 99-188. Therefore, we affirm without prejudice to any right Pruitte may have to file a facially sufficient rule 3.800(a) motion raising this claim.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Pruitte v. State, 845 So. 2d 314, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 7144, 2003 WL 21118674 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).
845 So. 2d 314 (Pruitte v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Kaymore v. State
846 So. 2d 1254 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
Swain v. State
845 So. 2d 314 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)