Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Pruitte v. State

Pruitte v. State

845 So. 2d 314, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 7144, 2003 WL 21118674
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 16, 2003
DocketNo. 2D02-5182
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 845 So. 2d 314 (Pruitte v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pruitte v. State, 845 So. 2d 314, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 7144, 2003 WL 21118674 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinion

NORTHCUTT, Judge.

Richard V. Pruitte argues that his violent career criminal sentence is illegal under Taylor v. State, 818 So.2d 544 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002), which held chapter 99-188, Laws of Florida, unconstitutional. However, his claim is facially insufficient because he has failed to allege how he was affected by the amendments to the violent career criminal statute contained within chapter 99-188. Therefore, we affirm without prejudice to any right Pruitte may have to file a facially sufficient rule 3.800(a) motion raising this claim.

Affirmed.

ALTENBERND, C.J., and KELLY, J., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kaymore v. State
846 So. 2d 1254 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
Swain v. State
845 So. 2d 314 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
845 So. 2d 314, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 7144, 2003 WL 21118674, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pruitte-v-state-fladistctapp-2003.