Pruitt v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.

196 So. 2d 688, 280 Ala. 570, 1967 Ala. LEXIS 832
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided March 9, 1967·No. 8 Div. 176·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This Court in the above cause granted a petition for a writ of certiorari and [571] ordered the record of the proceedings sent here.

The record is before us, but no assignments of error were incorporated. Without an assignment of error nothing is presented for review. Ex parte Russell, 280 Ala. 30, 189 So.2d 760; Ex parte Belcher v. City Commission of the City of Birmingham, 280 Ala. 252, 192 So.2d 454.

There being no assignment of error, an order of affirmance is due to be entered, and it is so ordered. Rule 1, Rules of Practice in the Supreme Court, Appendix, Title 7, Code of Alabama 1940; Dobson v. Deason, 258 Ala. 219, 61 So.2d 764.

The foregoing opinion was prepared by B. W. Simmons, Supernumerary Circuit Judge, and was adopted by the Court as its opinion.

Affirmed.

LIVINGSTON, C. J., and LAWSON, 'GOODWYN and COLEMAN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pruitt v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co., 196 So. 2d 688, 280 Ala. 570, 1967 Ala. LEXIS 832 (Ala. 1967).

196 So. 2d 688 (Pruitt v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gladwell v. Scarbrough
252 So. 2d 325 (Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama, 1971)