Pruitt v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Pruitt v. State

678 S.W.2d 76, 1984 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 662

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedMay 23, 1984

DocketNo. 1051-83

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 678 S.W.2d 76 (Pruitt v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pruitt v. State, 678 S.W.2d 76, 1984 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 662 (Tex. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was convicted of forgery by passing. In an unpublished opinion the Court of Appeals affirmed. The cause is before this Court to determine the sufficiency of the evidence.

We have carefully reviewed the briefs of the respective parties and the opinion of the Court of Appeals and have determined that the decision of the Court of Appeals is correct. The appellant’s petition for discretionary review was improvidently granted. It is therefore ordered dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was convicted of forgery by passing. In an unpublished opinion the Court of Appeals affirmed. The cause is before this Court to determine the sufficiency of the evidence.

We have carefully reviewed the briefs of the respective parties and the opinion of the Court of Appeals and have determined that the decision of the Court of Appeals is correct. The appellant’s petition for discretionary review was improvidently granted. It is therefore ordered dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

678 S.W.2d 76, 1984 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 662, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pruitt-v-state-texcrimapp-1984.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack