Pruitt v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Pruitt v. State

1913 OK CR 340, 133 P. 1197, 10 Okla. Crim. 645, 1913 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 287

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma·Decided August 14, 1913·No. No. A-1637.·Published

Opinion

PER, CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error, Tom Pruitt, was convicted at the December^ 1911, term of the district court of Jefferson county on a charge of grand larceny, • and his punishment fixed at imprisonment for a year and a day in the state prison at Granite. The appeal was filed in this case on the 6th day of March, 1912, more than a year prior to the date the cause was set for hearing in this court. No brief was filed on behalf of the plaintiff in error and no appearance made for oral argument. No fundamental error appearing from the record, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Mandate stayed for thirty days.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER, CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error, Tom Pruitt, was convicted at the December^ 1911, term of the district court of Jefferson county on a charge of grand larceny, • and his punishment fixed at imprisonment for a year and a day in the state prison at Granite. The appeal was filed in this case on the 6th day of March, 1912, more than a year prior to the date the cause was set for hearing in this court. No brief was filed on behalf of the plaintiff in error and no appearance made for oral argument. No fundamental error appearing from the record, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Mandate stayed for thirty days.

Pruitt v. State, 1913 OK CR 340, 133 P. 1197, 10 Okla. Crim. 645, 1913 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 287 (Okla. Ct. App. 1913).

Pincite

1913 OK CR 340 (Pruitt v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.