Pruitt v. State

572 S.W.3d 595
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedApril 23, 2019
DocketNo. ED 106702
StatusPublished

This text of 572 S.W.3d 595 (Pruitt v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pruitt v. State, 572 S.W.3d 595 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Sylvester Pruitt appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
572 S.W.3d 595, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pruitt-v-state-moctapp-2019.