Pruitt v. State

363 So. 2d 611
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 25, 1978
DocketNo. 78-471
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 363 So. 2d 611 (Pruitt v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pruitt v. State, 363 So. 2d 611 (Fla. Ct. App. 1978).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

After reviewing the briefs and record on appeal, we find appellant has failed to demonstrate any reversible error; therefore, the judgment appealed is affirmed. The judgment and sentence of the court, while indicating the appellant was to receive credit for all time served in jail, does not specifically set forth the period of credit time to be allowed as required by Section 921.161(1) Florida Statutes. Smith v. State, 310 So.2d 770 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975).

Remanded for correction of the sentence; otherwise affirmed. Appellant need not be present for this purpose.

GRIMES, C. J., and HOBSON and SCHEB, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Napoles v. State
470 So. 2d 72 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)
Wasserman v. State
446 So. 2d 231 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
363 So. 2d 611, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pruitt-v-state-fladistctapp-1978.