Pruitt v. State
This text of 197 So. 519 (Pruitt v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Plaintiff in error was tried for murder in the first degree and convicted of manslaughter. He was sentenced to serve seven years in the state penitentiary and seeks relief from that judgment by writ of error.
Five grounds are urged for reversal but they all go to the exclusion or admissibility of proferred evidence.
The record has been examined and no reversible error is made to appear. The assignments go to matters largely in the discretion of the trial court and it is not made to appear that his discretion was abused. The evidence was ample to have supported a higher degree of homicide so the judgment is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
197 So. 519, 143 Fla. 897, 1940 Fla. LEXIS 1308, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pruitt-v-state-fla-1940.