Pruitt v. State
This text of 166 So. 730 (Pruitt v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The sheriff and his chief deputy searched the house of defendant in his absence and found in a bedroom, in the pocket of a pair of overalls hanging near the bed, about three-fourths- of a “short pint” of whisky. The defendant had not been at home since 6:30 in the morning. There were other people in the house in defendant’s absence, any of whom may have placed the whisky in the pocket of the overalls. Under all of our decisions, this evidence falls far short of connecting the defendant with the possession. Pate v. State, ante, p. 73, 165 So. 783; Alford v. State, 26 Ala.App. 188, 155 So. 388.
The judgment is reversed, and the cause is remanded.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
166 So. 730, 27 Ala. App. 137, 1936 Ala. App. LEXIS 63, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pruitt-v-state-alactapp-1936.