Pruitt v. State
115 So. 925, 22 Ala. App. 687
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Pruitt v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 22 Ala. App. 353 →
Opinion
In this case the accused, appellant here, was tried and convicted for a violation of the state prohibition laws. Prom the judgment of conviction he appealed. There is no bill of exceptions. The record proper, upon which this appeal is rested, is regular and without error. The judgment of conviction in the lower court is affirmed. Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Pruitt v. State, 115 So. 925, 22 Ala. App. 687 (Ala. Ct. App. 1928).
115 So. 925 (Pruitt v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.