Pruitt v. State

584 So. 2d 963, 1991 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 1130, 1991 WL 119407
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Pruitt v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1991 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 1396
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama·Decided June 14, 1991·No. CR 90-870·Published

Opinion

TAYLOR, Judge.

The appellant, Walton Pruitt, appeals from the denial of his Rule 20, A.R.Crim. P.Temp., (now Rule 32, A.R.Crim.P.), petition. The state filed a motion requesting that this case be remanded to the Circuit Court for Bullock County so that the trial court could make specific findings of fact as required by Rule 20.9(d), A.R.Crim. P.Temp.

Therefore, pursuant to Rule 20.9(d), A.R.Crim.P.Temp., this case is remanded to the Bullock County Circuit Court for proceedings consistent with this opinion. A return should be filed with this court within 90 days from the date of this opinion.

REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.

All the Judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pruitt v. State, 584 So. 2d 963, 1991 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 1130, 1991 WL 119407 (Ala. Ct. App. 1991).

584 So. 2d 963 (Pruitt v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.