Pruitt v. Pernell

Fourth Circuit

Pruitt v. Pernell

173 F. App'x 298

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 3, 2006·No. No. 05-1132·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Appellants appeal the district court’s order denying qualified immunity in this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Pruitt v. Pernell, No. CA-02-270-5-BO (E.D.N.C. Jan. 5, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Appellants appeal the district court’s order denying qualified immunity in this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Pruitt v. Pernell, No. CA-02-270-5-BO (E.D.N.C. Jan. 5, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Pruitt v. Pernell, 173 F. App'x 298 (4th Cir. 2006).

Pincite

173 F. App'x 298 (Pruitt v. Pernell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related