Pruitt v. Pernell

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedApril 3, 2006
Docket05-1132
StatusUnpublished

This text of Pruitt v. Pernell (Pruitt v. Pernell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pruitt v. Pernell, (4th Cir. 2006).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-1132

KENNETH RAY PRUITT,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

BILLY PERNELL, Sharpsburg Police Chief; TOWN OF SHARPSBURG, NC; M. L. FELLNER, Officer; JOEL BATCHELOR, Officer,

Defendants - Appellants,

and

GEORGE BOTTOMS, Officer,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (CA-02-270-5-BO)

Submitted: February 28, 2006 Decided: April 3, 2006

Before MICHAEL, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Scott Christopher Hart, SUMRELL, SUGG, CARMICHAEL, HICKS & HART, P.A., New Bern, North Carolina, for Appellants. Kenneth Ray Pruitt, Appellee Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

- 2 - PER CURIAM:

Appellants appeal the district court’s order denying

qualified immunity in this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) action. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Pruitt v.

Pernell, No. CA-02-270-5-BO (E.D.N.C. Jan. 5, 2005). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 3 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Pruitt v. Pernell, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pruitt-v-pernell-ca4-2006.