Pruitt v. Pernell
This text of Pruitt v. Pernell (Pruitt v. Pernell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-1132
KENNETH RAY PRUITT,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
BILLY PERNELL, Sharpsburg Police Chief; TOWN OF SHARPSBURG, NC; M. L. FELLNER, Officer; JOEL BATCHELOR, Officer,
Defendants - Appellants,
and
GEORGE BOTTOMS, Officer,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (CA-02-270-5-BO)
Submitted: February 28, 2006 Decided: April 3, 2006
Before MICHAEL, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Scott Christopher Hart, SUMRELL, SUGG, CARMICHAEL, HICKS & HART, P.A., New Bern, North Carolina, for Appellants. Kenneth Ray Pruitt, Appellee Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 - PER CURIAM:
Appellants appeal the district court’s order denying
qualified immunity in this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) action. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Pruitt v.
Pernell, No. CA-02-270-5-BO (E.D.N.C. Jan. 5, 2005). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 3 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Pruitt v. Pernell, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pruitt-v-pernell-ca4-2006.