Pruitt v. Moore

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: February 6, 2004
• Docket: 03-7149
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-7149

JERRY NATHAN PRUITT,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

MICHAEL MOORE, Director of South Carolina Department of Corrections; NATHANIEL HUGHES; ARA HEALTH SERVICES; CMS; DR. KENNEDY; DOCTOR ALEWINE; DOCTOR RENTZ; DOCTOR GOWAN; MR. GIDDINGS; MR. LESTER; KEN MCKELLAR; MR. MCCANTS; JOHN KING, Mr.; MR. COHEN; MR. CAUSEY; MR. LONG; ALBRITAN; MS. FREEMAN; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER WHITNEY; LEVINE; MS. OSWALD; GERALDINE MIRO,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Margaret B. Seymour, District Judge. (CA-02-395-3-24BC)

Submitted: November 26, 2003 Decided: February 6, 2004

Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jerry Nathan Pruitt, Appellant Pro Se. Christy Scott Stephens, Elbert Olivine Duffie, III, Robert Douglas Simmons Mellard, BOGOSLOW, JONES, STEPHENS & DUFFIE, P.A., Walterboro, South Carolina; James Miller Davis, Jr., DAVIDSON, MORRISON & LINDEMANN, P.A., Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

2 PER CURIAM:

Jerry Nathan Pruitt appeals the district court’s order

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on

the reasoning of the district court. See Pruitt v. Moore, No. CA-

02-395-3-24BC (D.S.C. July 9, 2003). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED