Pruitt v. Moore

Fourth Circuit

Pruitt v. Moore

86 F. App'x 615

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 6, 2004·No. No. 03-7149·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Jerry Nathan Pruitt appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we [616] affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Pruitt v. Moore, No. CA-02-395-3-24BC (D.S.C. July 9, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Jerry Nathan Pruitt appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we [616] affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Pruitt v. Moore, No. CA-02-395-3-24BC (D.S.C. July 9, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Pruitt v. Moore, 86 F. App'x 615 (4th Cir. 2004).

Pincite

86 F. App'x 615 (Pruitt v. Moore) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related