Pruitt v. Law , County Board

137 S.E. 216, 140 S.C. 50, 1927 S.C. LEXIS 17
CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina
DecidedMarch 10, 1927
Docket12175
StatusPublished

This text of 137 S.E. 216 (Pruitt v. Law , County Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pruitt v. Law , County Board, 137 S.E. 216, 140 S.C. 50, 1927 S.C. LEXIS 17 (S.C. 1927).

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. ChiEB Justice Watts.

*51 This matter is brought in the original jurisdiction of this Court to obtain the release of the petitioner, Thomas P. Pruitt, on two grounds, to wit, that his sentence has expired by operation of law, and, further, that he is entitled to' be discharged under the indeterminate sentence Act of 1925.

The position of petitioner" is untenable. He has been sentenced for 40 years; the Governor commuted that sentence to 10 years. The sentence still stands, having been modified by action of the Governor by commuting the sentence to 10 years.

Under the Act of "Legislature, Act of 1925, p. 63, entitled, “An Act regulating sentences, and the manner of service of sentences, of persons convicted of crime, and providing a penalty for certain violations thereof,” it is left to the board of pardons for their action. The-Courts have nothing to do with their action unless it should be made to appear that the board of pardons manifestly ¿bused the discretion conferred upon them.

There being no merit in the contention of the petitioner, the petition is dismissed.

Messrs. Justices Cothran, Brease, Stabrer and Carter concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
137 S.E. 216, 140 S.C. 50, 1927 S.C. LEXIS 17, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pruitt-v-law-county-board-sc-1927.