Pruitt v. Kilbane, Unpublished Decision (6-21-2004)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Pruitt v. Kilbane, Unpublished Decision (6-21-2004)

2004 Ohio 3461

CourtOhio Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 21, 2004

DocketCase No. 84606, Original Action.

StatusUnpublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 2004 Ohio 3461 (Pruitt v. Kilbane, Unpublished Decision (6-21-2004)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pruitt v. Kilbane, Unpublished Decision (6-21-2004), 2004 Ohio 3461 (Ohio Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION {¶ 1} On May 6, 2004, Michael Pruitt, through counsel, commenced this habeas action against respondents Judge Mary Kilbane and Chief Edward Lohn claiming that he has been held unlawfully on an illegal $10,000 cash only bond, and in violation of his right to a preliminary hearing. On May 14, 2004, this court, sua sponte, ordered respondent to show cause why this petition should not be dismissed for failure to comply with R.C.2725.04(D). Thereafter, on May 17, 2004, petitioner demonstrated good cause and supplemented his petition with a copy of the municipal court's journal entry ordering Pruitt into custody and setting a $10,000 cash only bond. On May 21, 2004, respondents, through the Director of Law for the City of Cleveland, filed a brief in opposition to petition for writ of habeas corpus which this court sua sponte converted to a motion for summary judgment.

{¶ 2} According to the motion for summary judgment, the Cuyahoga County Grand Jury indicted Pruitt with a four-count indictment. The record further discloses that at arraignment, Pruitt's bond was set at $100,000, cash, surety or property. Accordingly, Pruitt's request for a writ of habeas corpus is rendered moot.

{¶ 3} Pruitt also failed to name the correct party respondent. Pruitt named the Judge and Chief of Police rather than the custodian. R.C.2725.04(B). See also, State ex rel. Sherrills v. State, 91 Ohio St.3d 133,2001-Ohio-299, 742 N.E.2d 651 (affirming the sua sponte dismissal of a petition for habeas corpus, inter alia, because the petitioner did not name the proper respondents). Accordingly, the motion for summary judgment is granted. Petitioner to pay costs. The clerk is directed to serve upon the parties notice of this judgment and its date of entry upon the journal. Civ.R. 58(B).

Writ Dismissed.

Kilbane, P.J., concurs. Karpinski, J., concurs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION {¶ 1} On May 6, 2004, Michael Pruitt, through counsel, commenced this habeas action against respondents Judge Mary Kilbane and Chief Edward Lohn claiming that he has been held unlawfully on an illegal $10,000 cash only bond, and in violation of his right to a preliminary hearing. On May 14, 2004, this court, sua sponte, ordered respondent to show cause why this petition should not be dismissed for failure to comply with R.C.2725.04(D). Thereafter, on May 17, 2004, petitioner demonstrated good cause and supplemented his petition with a copy of the municipal court's journal entry ordering Pruitt into custody and setting a $10,000 cash only bond. On May 21, 2004, respondents, through the Director of Law for the City of Cleveland, filed a brief in opposition to petition for writ of habeas corpus which this court sua sponte converted to a motion for summary judgment.

{¶ 2} According to the motion for summary judgment, the Cuyahoga County Grand Jury indicted Pruitt with a four-count indictment. The record further discloses that at arraignment, Pruitt's bond was set at $100,000, cash, surety or property. Accordingly, Pruitt's request for a writ of habeas corpus is rendered moot.

{¶ 3} Pruitt also failed to name the correct party respondent. Pruitt named the Judge and Chief of Police rather than the custodian. R.C.2725.04(B). See also, State ex rel. Sherrills v. State, 91 Ohio St.3d 133,2001-Ohio-299, 742 N.E.2d 651 (affirming the sua sponte dismissal of a petition for habeas corpus, inter alia, because the petitioner did not name the proper respondents). Accordingly, the motion for summary judgment is granted. Petitioner to pay costs. The clerk is directed to serve upon the parties notice of this judgment and its date of entry upon the journal. Civ.R. 58(B).

Writ Dismissed.

Kilbane, P.J., concurs. Karpinski, J., concurs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2004 Ohio 3461, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pruitt-v-kilbane-unpublished-decision-6-21-2004-ohioctapp-2004.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack