Pruitt v. Bell

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Pruitt v. Bell

168 S.E. 920, 46 Ga. App. 704, 1933 Ga. App. LEXIS 202

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided April 5, 1933·No. 22660·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Sutton, J.

Counsel for the defendant in error having advised the clerk of this court by letter that the “issues in this case have been settled and satisfied,” and this statement having been confirmed in a letter from counsel for the plaintiffs in error to the clerk of this court, in which he admits that the questions or issues in the case have become moot, the writ of error is hereby dismissed.

Writ of error dismissed.

Jenkins, P. J., and Stephens, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sutton, J.

Counsel for the defendant in error having advised the clerk of this court by letter that the “issues in this case have been settled and satisfied,” and this statement having been confirmed in a letter from counsel for the plaintiffs in error to the clerk of this court, in which he admits that the questions or issues in the case have become moot, the writ of error is hereby dismissed.

Writ of error dismissed.

Jenkins, P. J., and Stephens, J., concur.

Pruitt v. Bell, 168 S.E. 920, 46 Ga. App. 704, 1933 Ga. App. LEXIS 202 (Ga. Ct. App. 1933).

Pincite

168 S.E. 920 (Pruitt v. Bell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related