Pruette v. Middleton

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Pruette v. Middleton

616 So. 2d 628, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 4511, 1993 WL 116749

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 16, 1993

DocketNo. 92-2775

StatusPublished

This text of 616 So. 2d 628 (Pruette v. Middleton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pruette v. Middleton, 616 So. 2d 628, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 4511, 1993 WL 116749 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Having carefully reviewed the record and the briefs of the parties, we conclude that Appellant has failed to demonstrate any abuse of discretion in the entry of the order under review. If Appellant’s income has decreased significantly after the entry of the trial court’s order in July 1992 from that shown for the period January to November 1991, Appellant may apply to the trial court for modification of the child support award based on a substantial change of circumstances.

AFFIRMED.

SMITH, ZEHMER and ALLEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Having carefully reviewed the record and the briefs of the parties, we conclude that Appellant has failed to demonstrate any abuse of discretion in the entry of the order under review. If Appellant’s income has decreased significantly after the entry of the trial court’s order in July 1992 from that shown for the period January to November 1991, Appellant may apply to the trial court for modification of the child support award based on a substantial change of circumstances.

AFFIRMED.

SMITH, ZEHMER and ALLEN, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

616 So. 2d 628, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 4511, 1993 WL 116749, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pruette-v-middleton-fladistctapp-1993.