Pruett v. Unifi, L.L.C.

CourtDistrict Court, D. Nevada
DecidedJune 30, 2023
Docket3:23-cv-00008
StatusUnknown

This text of Pruett v. Unifi, L.L.C. (Pruett v. Unifi, L.L.C.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Nevada primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pruett v. Unifi, L.L.C., (D. Nev. 2023).

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 9 10 CHRISTOPHER PRUETT, CASE NO. 3:23-cv-00008-LRH-CLB 11 Plaintiff, PROTECTIVE ORDER 12 vs. 13 UNIFI AVIATION, L.L.C., 14 Defendant. __________________________________ 15 16 17 I. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS 18 Disclosure and discovery activity in this action may involve production of confidential, 19 proprietary, or private information for which special protection from disclosure may be warranted 20 under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c)(1). To promote the exchange of discovery, the Court 21 grants the request that the following proposed Protective Order be approved by this Court= 22 before certain information and documents are produced. The proposed Protective Order 23 does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to discovery and that the 24 protection it affords extends to only the limited information or items that are entitled under law to 25 treatment as confidential. 26 27 28 1 II. STIPULATION 2 1. Scope 3 All documents produced in the course of discovery, all responses to discovery requests, 4 and all deposition testimony and exhibits and any other materials which may be subject to 5 discovery (hereinafter collectively “Discovery Material”) shall be subject to this 6 protective order concerning confidential information as set forth below. Any party, or any third 7 party who produces documents in this litigation, may designate documents as “Confidential” or 8 “Attorneys’ Eyes Only,” but only after review of the documents by an attorney who has, in good 9 faith, determined that the documents contain “Confidential Information,” as defined below, and 10 pursuant to the procedure set forth below. 11 2. Definition of Confidential Information 12 As used herein: 13 a. “Confidential Information” shall mean all information (regardless of how 14 generated, stored, or maintained), material, tangible things, or testimony that qualify for 15 protection under standards developed under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, produced by or 16 disclosed to a Received party by a Producing party that the Producing party or a Designating 17 party reasonably and in good faith considers to be confidential or proprietary information or trade 18 secrets of the Producing party and which has been so designated by the Producing party or 19 Designating party. Such information, material, tangible things, or testimony may include, but is 20 not limited to, trade secrets, proprietary business information, competitively sensitive 21 information, technical information, customer information, confidential information relating to 22 employees, vendor information, financial information, sales data, business plans and strategies, 23 agreements and communications, or other information the disclosure of which the Producing 24 party or the Designating party reasonably and in good faith considers to be confidential or 25 proprietary information or trade secrets of the Producing party or the disclosure of which would 26 otherwise be detrimental to the conduct of the Producing party’s business or the business of any 27 of the Producing party’s customers or clients. 28 1 Extracts and summaries of Confidential Information shall also be treated as confidential. 2 The following are examples of information that is not Confidential Information: 3 i. published advertising materials; 4 ii. any information that is, or, after its disclosure to a Receiving party, becomes 5 part of the public domain as a result of publication not involving a violation of this 6 Protective Order; 7 iii. information that the Receiving party can show by written records was already 8 known to it prior to the disclosure, provided that it was either (i) received from the Producing 9 party and was not received under an express or implied obligation of confidentiality to the 10 Producing party, or (ii) received from a source who obtained the information lawfully and under 11 no express or implied obligation of confidentiality to the Producing party; 12 iv. any information that the Receiving party can show by written records was 13 received by it after the disclosure from a source who obtained the information lawfully and under 14 no express or implied obligation of confidentiality to the Producing party; and 15 v. any information that the Receiving party can show was independently 16 developed by it after the time of disclosure by personnel who did not have access to the Producing 17 party’s Confidential Information. 18 b. “Attorney Eyes Only Information” shall mean all Confidential Information that, 19 consistent with the terms and conditions below, the Producing party or Designating party 20 reasonably and in good faith considers to be so sensitive that its dissemination deserves further 21 limitation by preventing the disclosure thereof to the Receiving party. As such, Attorney Eyes 22 Only Information shall only be disclosed to the Receiving party’s counsel and persons identified 23 in Paragraph II(4)(b) herein below, but shall not be disclosed to the Receiving party. Attorney 24 Eyes Only Information is a subset of Confidential Information, and shall be treated as 25 Confidential Information, except as specifically stated otherwise hereinbelow. 26 c. “Producing party” shall mean any Party to this action or any non-party to this 27 action producing Confidential Information in connection with depositions, document production 28 1 or otherwise, or the party asserting the confidentiality privilege, as the case may be. 2 d. “Receiving party” shall mean any Party to this action or any non-party to this 3 action receiving Confidential Information in connection with depositions, document production or 4 otherwise in this action. 5 e. “Designating party” shall mean any party to the above-captioned action or any 6 Producing party that designated the Confidential Information as “confidential” by notation on the 7 document, statement on the record of the deposition, written advice to the respective undersigned 8 counsel for the Parties hereto if the Confidential Information is not reduced to documentary, 9 tangible, or physical form, if the Confidential Information cannot conveniently be so designated, 10 or consistent with the terms of this Protective Order, or by other appropriate means. 11 3. Right to Designate Information as Confidential 12 Subject to the terms of paragraphs II(4) and II(8), any party may act as a Designating 13 party and designate information, material, tangible things, or testimony produced or given by a 14 Producing party in connection with this action that said Designating party reasonably and in good 15 faith considers to be Confidential Information by notation on the document, statement on the 16 record of the deposition with subsequent notation by the Producing party or Designating party on 17 the cover page of the deposition transcript if not already present on the cover page of the 18 transcript when received from the court reporter, written advice to the respective undersigned 19 counsel for the Parties hereto if the Confidential Information is not reduced to documentary, 20 tangible, or physical form, if the Confidential Information cannot conveniently be so designated, 21 or consistent with the terms of this Protective Order, or by other appropriate means.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Center for Auto Safety v. Chrysler Group, LLC
809 F.3d 1092 (Ninth Circuit, 2016)
Carney v. Resolution Trust Corp.
10 F.3d 1164 (Fifth Circuit, 1994)
FCA U.S. LLC v. Ctr. for Auto Safety
137 S. Ct. 38 (Supreme Court, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Pruett v. Unifi, L.L.C., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pruett-v-unifi-llc-nvd-2023.