Pruett v. Tuckaseegbe

138 S.E. 341, 193 N.C. 854
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedJune 10, 1927
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 138 S.E. 341 (Pruett v. Tuckaseegbe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pruett v. Tuckaseegbe, 138 S.E. 341, 193 N.C. 854 (N.C. 1927).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The plaintiffs brought suit to recover damages for injury to their property caused by fire alleged to have been negligently set out by the defendant in the operation of its 'train. The one exception appearing in the record presents the question whether the presiding judge complied with C. S., 564. The appellant has failed to convince us that he did not. We find

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re V.P.M.A.
817 S.E.2d 922 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2018)
State Distributing Corp. v. Travelers Indemnity Co.
224 N.C. 370 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1944)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
138 S.E. 341, 193 N.C. 854, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pruett-v-tuckaseegbe-nc-1927.