Pruett v. Tuckaseegbe
138 S.E. 341, 193 N.C. 854
Opinion
The plaintiffs brought suit to recover damages for injury to their property caused by fire alleged to have been negligently set out by the defendant in the operation of its 'train. The one exception appearing in the record presents the question whether the presiding judge complied with C. S., 564. The appellant has failed to convince us that he did not. We find
No error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Pruett v. Tuckaseegbe, 138 S.E. 341, 193 N.C. 854 (N.C. 1927).
138 S.E. 341 (Pruett v. Tuckaseegbe) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re V.P.M.A.
817 S.E.2d 922 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2018)
State Distributing Corp. v. Travelers Indemnity Co.
224 N.C. 370 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1944)