Pruett v. State

128 S.E. 438, 34 Ga. App. 134, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 71
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJune 9, 1925
Docket16371
StatusPublished

This text of 128 S.E. 438 (Pruett v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pruett v. State, 128 S.E. 438, 34 Ga. App. 134, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 71 (Ga. Ct. App. 1925).

Opinion

Luke, J.

Pruett was convicted of violating the prohibition law; and his ■ motion for a new trial assigns error upon the grounds (a) that his conviction was not authorized by the evidence; (&) that the venue was not proved; and- (c) upon the ground of newly discovered evidence. No ground of the motion for a new trial is meritorious.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
128 S.E. 438, 34 Ga. App. 134, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 71, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pruett-v-state-gactapp-1925.