Prudovsky v. New York Life Insurance

162 Misc. 11, 293 N.Y.S. 656, 1936 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1653
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedDecember 11, 1936
StatusPublished

This text of 162 Misc. 11 (Prudovsky v. New York Life Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Prudovsky v. New York Life Insurance, 162 Misc. 11, 293 N.Y.S. 656, 1936 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1653 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The answers to the questions as to whether the applicant had received medical advice during the preceding five years or had been treated for certain enumerated diseases are as a matter of law material to the risk, and if false, plaintiff cannot recover.

Judgment reversed, with thirty dollars costs, and complaint dismissed on the merits, with costs.

All concur. Present — Lydon, Levy and Hammer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
162 Misc. 11, 293 N.Y.S. 656, 1936 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1653, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/prudovsky-v-new-york-life-insurance-nyappterm-1936.