Prudovsky v. New York Life Insurance
This text of 162 Misc. 11 (Prudovsky v. New York Life Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The answers to the questions as to whether the applicant had received medical advice during the preceding five years or had been treated for certain enumerated diseases are as a matter of law material to the risk, and if false, plaintiff cannot recover.
Judgment reversed, with thirty dollars costs, and complaint dismissed on the merits, with costs.
All concur. Present — Lydon, Levy and Hammer, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
162 Misc. 11, 293 N.Y.S. 656, 1936 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1653, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/prudovsky-v-new-york-life-insurance-nyappterm-1936.